Annals of African Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2010  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 147--151

An audit of spirometry at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria (2002-2009)


Olufemi O Desalu, Alakija K Salami, Ademola E Fawibe, Patrick O Oluboyo 
 Department of Medicine, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Olufemi O Desalu
Department of Medicine, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin
Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Spirometry is a noninvasive and cost-effective physiologic test that greatly complements other investigative procedures in evaluation of respiratory conditions. This study was aimed at auditing the spirometry performed at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH) Ilorin, Nigeria, and highlighting some of the challenges associated with the procedure. Methods: We reviewed and analyzed the record of spirometry performed at the cardiopulmonary unit of the hospital from June 2002 to December 2009. Results: A total of 119 patients had spirometry tests from 2002 to 2009 and their age ranged from 15 to 85 years with a mean of 47.6 ± 14.8 years. There were 69 (58%) males and the male:female ratio was 1.4:1. More than half (65%) of the tests were in patients <50 years old. The rate of spirometry performed annually increased from 12 (10.1%) in 2002 to 31 (26.1%) in year 2009. Evaluation of bronchial asthma was the most common indication for spirometry (43 patients; 36.1%). Majority of the requests (84 patients; 70.6%) were from adult respiratory physicians. The identified challenges were lack of awareness of the range of diseases that could be investigated by spirometry, lack of skills in interpreting the results, lack of time and delays in replacing exhausted consumables and faulty components of spirometer. Conclusion: Gradually, the trend of spirometry request is increasing in UITH; however, a wider acceptability could be achieved for this test by raising the level of awareness and improving the skills of all doctors on the usefulness and interpretation of spirometry.



How to cite this article:
Desalu OO, Salami AK, Fawibe AE, Oluboyo PO. An audit of spirometry at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria (2002-2009).Ann Afr Med 2010;9:147-151


How to cite this URL:
Desalu OO, Salami AK, Fawibe AE, Oluboyo PO. An audit of spirometry at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria (2002-2009). Ann Afr Med [serial online] 2010 [cited 2021 Dec 4 ];9:147-151
Available from: https://www.annalsafrmed.org/text.asp?2010/9/3/147/68365


Full Text

 Introduction



Spirometry is the timed measurement of dynamic lung volumes during forced expiration and inspiration to quantify how effectively and how quickly the lungs can be emptied and filled. [1] It can also be used in the detection of respiratory disease in patients presenting with symptoms of breathlessness, wheeze, cough, stridor and in the differentiation of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defects. The test can be useful in distinguishing respiratory from cardiac disease as the cause of breathlessness and also in screening for respiratory disease in certain high-risk situations (e.g. pre-employment in industries in which occupational asthma is prevalent). [1],[2],[3] The surgeons and anesthetists use spirometry for pre-operative risk assessment prior to anesthesia and abdominal or thoracic surgery. [1],[2],[3],[4] Reduced force expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) has been found to be a marker for premature death from all causes as well as for cardiovascular mortality, independent of age, gender, and smoking history. [5],[6] Furthermore, spirometry is also a long-term predictor for overall survival rates in both the genders and could be used as a tool in general health assessment. [7]

The World Health Organization (WHO) has projected that the global burden of chronic respiratory diseases will increase considerably in the future. [2] To reduce the extent of morbidity and mortality arising from respiratory diseases in low and middle income countries, there is a need for surveillance and early diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory diseases. [8] High-tech diagnostic facilities like fiber-optic bronchoscope and computerized tomography scans are not readily available in most healthcare facilities across the country except for chest radiograph, microbiological and cytological studies of sputum specimens.

Spirometry is a noninvasive and cost-effective physiologic test that greatly complements other investigative procedures in the evaluation of respiratory conditions. Studies on spirometry had been conducted in the last two decades in Nigeria. [9],[10],[11],[12],[13] A recent study reported that knowledge and practice of spirometry were poor among hospital-based Nigerian doctors and that spirometer was unavailable in most hospitals. [14] However, where spirometry is available to the medical doctors, there is a dearth of data on its use in Nigerian hospitals. This study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on spirometry locally by auditing the spirometry performed at the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH) Ilorin, Nigeria, and highlighting some of the challenges associated with the procedure.

 Material and Methods



We reviewed all the spirometry tests performed from June 2002 to December 2009 at UITH. Our center is a 459-bed hospital that functions as a primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facility. The catchment areas of the hospital include the city of Ilorin and the adjoining towns. Referrals are also received from public and private hospitals in the neighboring states. The cost of spirometry is 750 Naira equivalent to US $5. All the spirometry tests were conducted by the respiratory physician and senior resident using the Spirolite spirometer 303, 2001 model (Serial no 8187) manufactured by Medical System International Corporation Greenvale NY 11548 USA. The procedure was conducted and the result interpreted in accordance with standardization requirement of the American thoracic society (ATS). [15] The records of the spirometry performed from June 2002 to December 2009 were retrieved from the database of the cardiopulmonary unit of the hospital; in addition, the total number of respiratory cases managed in the Department of Medicine during this period was also retrieved. Information in relation to patients' age, sex, body mass index, specialty of the physician requesting for the test, indication for test, type of spirometry (routine/reversibility/airway resistance) and outcome of the test results were extracted from spirometry register. The outcome of the test were classified as (1) normal if FEV1/FVC was >70%, (2) obstructive ventilatory defect if the ratio of Force Expiratory Volume in one second to Force Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) was <70%, (3) restrictive ventilatory defect if the FVC was less than 80% predicted and the FEV1/FVC was greater than 80%, and (4) mixed ventilatory defect if the FVC was less than 80% predicted and the FEV1/FVC was <70%. [15] The data analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive and frequency statistics of general characteristics of the patients were performed; chi-square was used to determine the significance of the variables. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 Results



A total of 119 spirometry tests were performed in the hospitals during the study period. The age of the patients ranged from 15 to 85 years with a mean of 47.6 ± 14.8 years and median of 47 years. There were 69 males (58%) and 50 females (42%). The male:female ratio was 1.4:1. Most of the patients who had the test (42.0%) belonged to the age group 40-49 years [Table 1]. The number of spirometry tests performed annually increased from 12 (10.1%) in 2002 to 31 (26.1%) in the year 2009. The most common indication was for evaluation of bronchial asthma (43 patients; 36.1%), followed by screening for occupational lung diseases (25 patients; 21.0%) and diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in 23 (19.3%) patients [Table 2].

Of the 119 spirometry tests, 90 (75.6%) were routine spirometry (volume time and flow volume tests), while 19 (24.4%) were reversibility tests. Respiratory physicians requested for 84 (70.6%) of the tests, 25 (21%) were referred by family physicians/ general practitioner (GP), 4 (3.4%) by surgeons and 6 (5.0%) by other physicians [Table 3].

Outcome of the tests showed that 60 (50.4%) of the patients had obstructive ventilatory defect, 48 (40.3%) had a normal spirometry, 5 (4.2%) had mixed pattern, i.e., combination of obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defects, while 2 (1.7%) had restrictive ventilatory defect. Four patients (3.4%) had unacceptable result due to poor efforts and faulty method of blowing the spirometer [Table 4].

The trend of annual requests for spirometric test has been quite variable and low [Figure 1]. Clinical indications for the tests were, however, commonest for bronchial asthma, followed by COPD and preoperative evaluation. Lately, evaluation of unexplained dyspnea and screening for occupational lung diseases are becoming important indications for spirometric tests [Figure 2].

 Discussion



Clinical audit in medical practice is a process that seeks to identify areas for service improvement, to develop and carry out action plans to rectify or improve service provision and then to re-audit to ensure that these changes have an effect. [16] The rate utilization of spirometry for evaluating pulmonary disorders in our center has increased from 12 (10.1%) to 31 (26.1%) in the year 2009. This increase was rather poor over a 7-year period, meaning that the full benefit of the test was not being utilized. The rate of utilization can be increased if awareness amongst doctors is improved and benefits of the test are explained to the patients. The finding of increased utilization of spirometry in our center is similar to an observation in south eastern Nigeria. [13] In settings where policy regarding evaluation of respiratory symptoms is encouraged and enforced, it often reflects in increased utilization of spirometry as a procedure. [17] Majority (65%) of the patients who had spirometry were below the age of 50 years, which agrees with the finding of a similar study [13] but differs from a Canadian study, [17] in which majority of the patients who underwent spirometry were elderly. This may be due to the fact that asthma, which is a condition that occurs more frequently <45 years of age, was the commonest indication for spirometry in our center. Our result is similar to what was reported in south eastern Nigeria and Australia [13],[18] but is in contrast to a study in Nepal where COPD was the commonest indication for spirometry. [19] Although pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), asthma and pneumonia were the commonest causes of respiratory morbidity in our localities, [20] only bronchial asthma requires spirometry for diagnosis. We also found that 70.6% of the patients who had the test were referred by respiratory physicians, followed by the family physicians/GP (21.0%), who were mostly from other private hospitals; our finding is similar to that of previous studies. [13],[18] The reason for higher rate of referral by respiratory physician in our study may be due to poor appreciation of the importance of spirometry amongst non respiratory physician in patients' evaluation and partly due lack of sufficient knowledge and skills in interpreting the results of the spirogram. Petty in 2005 and Desalu et al in 2009 had highlighted these reasons as a barrier to the practice of spirometry. [14],[21] The factors enumerated above could perhaps partly explain the initial low and variable annual distribution of spirometry in this center: 10.1% in 2002, less than 10% from 2003 to 2007. The upsurge to 32.8% in 2008 was mainly due to the batch screening of bank workers to exclude occupation-related lung diseases due persistent handling of dirty and dust notes.

Generally, factors militating against comprehensive utilization of spirometry in this center could be grouped into two: (1) human; doctors and non doctors' related factors and (2) logistics and administrative factors. The former include, as earlier mentioned, poor appreciation of the importance and role of spirometry in the management of respiratory diseases as well as poor knowledge and skills of interpreting results of spirogram amongst the generality of non respiratory physicians in the hospital. There is no respiratory scientist in the employment of the hospital to conduct the tests and this explains why the conduct of the test becomes the responsibility of the respiratory physicians. However, this is an additional responsibility on a rather choked clinical and teaching schedule and this may sometimes affect the rate and quality of the spirometry conducted. Logistic problems such as delay in replenishing the exhausted consumables and repairing of faulty components of the spirometer are other factors impacting negatively on the conduct of spirometry. Despite the challenges of spirometry, there are rooms for improvement to overcome these challenges. The respiratory unit and the hospital management need to organize a continuous medical education program for all healthcare workers in the hospital. This should be used to raise their awareness and broadened their knowledge on spirometry. Clinical importance of spirometry in the evaluation of respiratory disorders also needs to be emphasized.

 Conclusion



The clinical application of spirometry is rather poor in our hospital and the reasons for these are both physician and management related. These could, however, be resolved by continuous medical education for both the cadres of hospital workers.

 Acknowledgment



We would like to specially thank the Head of cardiopulmonary unit of the Department of Medicine for the assistance provided in retrieving patients' data.

References

1Pierce RJ, Hillman D, Young IH, O′Donoghue F, Zimmerman PV, West S, et al. Respiratory function tests and their application. Respirology 2005;10:S1-19.
2Bousquet J. Dahl R, Khaltaev N. Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases. Eur Respir J 2007;29:233-9.
3Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardization of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319-38.
4Petty TL. Benefits of and barriers to the widespread use of spirometry. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2005;11:115-20.
5Sin DD, LieLing Wu, Paul Man SF. The relationship between reduced FEV1 and cardiovascular mortality. Chest 2005;127:1952-9.
6Young RP, Hopkins R, Eaton TE. Forced expiratory volume in one second: Not just a lung function test but a marker of premature death from all causes. Eur Respir J 2007;30:616-22.
7Schόnemann HJ, Dorn J, Grant BJ, Winkelstein W Jr, Trevisan M. Pulmonary function is a long-term predictor of mortality in the general population: 29-year follow-up of the Buffalo Health Study. Chest 2000;118:656-64.
8World Health Organization WHO Strategy for prevention and control of chronic respiratory diseases in low and middle income countries in 2003: A preliminary report. WHO/NMH/CRA/04.1.2003.
9Njoku CH, Anah CO. Reference value for peak expiratory flow rate in adult of African descent. Tropical Doctor 2004;34:135-40.
10Erhabor GE, Fatusi S, Obembe OB. Pulmonary functions in ARC-welders in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. East Afr Med J 2001;78:461-4.
11Ige OM, Onadeko OB. Respiratory symptoms and ventilatory function of the sawmillers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 2000;29:101-4.
12Elebute EA, Femi-Pearse D. Peak flow rate in Nigeria: Anthropometric determinants and usefulness in assessment of ventilator function. Thorax 1971;26:597-601.
13Onyedum CC, Chukwuka CJ. Indication for Spirometry at a Tertiary Hospital in South East Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2009;12:229-31.
14Desalu OO, Busari OA,Onyedum CC,Salawu FK, Obateru OA, Nwogu KC, et al. Evaluation of the Current knowledge, Awareness and Practice of spirometry among hospital-based Nigerian doctors. BMC Pulm Med 2009;9:50.
15ATS American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry: 1994 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1107-36.
16NICE. Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit (2002, NICE/CHI) Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/BestPracticeClinicalAudit.pdf [Last accessed on 2010 Feb 15].
17Chan B, Anderson G, Dales RE, Spirometry utilization in Ontario: Practice patterns and policy implications. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:169-76.
18Johns DP, Burton D, Walters JA, Wood-Baker R. National survey of spirometer ownership and usage in general practice in Australia. Respirology 2006;11:292-8.
19Neopane A, Poudel M, Pradhan B, Regmi S, Karki DB. Spirometry in evaluation of respiratory diseases. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2006;45:332-6.
20Desalu OO, Oluwafemi JA, Ojo O. Respiratory diseases morbidity and mortality among adults attending a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. J Bras Pneumol 2009;35:745-52.
21Petty TL. Benefits of and barriers to the widespread use of spirometry. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2005;11:115-20.