Annals of African Medicine
Home About AAM Editorial board Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe Contact us Search Login 


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 421-425  

Pattern of eye diseases in adults at the general outpatient clinic of a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria


1 Department of Ophthalmology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State; Department of Ophthalmology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Parklane, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital, Parklane, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, India

Date of Submission15-Jul-2021
Date of Decision06-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance03-Jan-2022
Date of Web Publication16-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Adaora Amaoge Onyiaorah
Department of Ophthalmology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_152_21

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Objective: To determine the pattern of eye diseases at the general outpatient department (GOPD) of a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: Patients selected by systematic random sampling at the GOPD of a Nigerian tertiary hospital were studied. Information on sociodemographics and ocular complaints were obtained using interviewer-administered questionnaire. Ocular examination included visual acuity measurement and anterior and posterior segments examinations. Data analysis was with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Three hundred and eighty-two patients, comprising 124 (32.5%) males and 258 (67.5%) females, aged between 18 and 86 years, mean 44.8 ± 15.4 years, were studied; 112 (29.3%) had eye diseases but only 88 (78.6%) patients complained of ocular disorder(s). Common complaints were poor vision 53 (60.4%), red eye and grittiness 15 (17.0%) each. Common eye diseases were lens 52 (13.6%) and conjunctiva 46 (12.0%) disorders. Attaining higher education was protective against eye diseases (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Nearly a third of patients at the GOPD have eye diseases. Therefore, primary eye care should be integrated into the GOPD service with provision of relevant manpower and facilities for care of the ophthalmic patients.

   Abstract in French 

Résumé
Objectif: Pour déterminer le schéma des maladies oculaires au service général de consultation externe d'un hôpital tertiaire nigérian. Matériels et Méthodes: Des malades sélectionnés par échantillonnages aléatoires systématiques au service ambulatoire général, d'un hôpital tertiaire au nigérian on été étudies. Les informations sur les données sociodémographiques et les plaintes oculaires ont été obtenues à l'aide d'un questionnaire lors d un interview. L'examen oculaire comprenait la mesure de l'acuité visuelle et de l'examen des segments antérieur et postérieur. L'analyse données a été effectuée par le progiciel des sciences sociales. Résultats: Trois cent quatre-vingt-deux malades, comprenant 124(32,5%) hommes et 258 (67,5%) femmes, âges entre 18 et 86 ans, moyenne 44,8 ± 15,4 ans, ont été étudiés ; 112 (29,3%) avaient des maladies oculaires mais seulement 88 (78,6%) malades se plaignaient de trouble(s) oculaire(s). Les plaintes les plus courantes étaient une mauvaise vision 53 (60,4%), les yeux rouges et la sécheresse oculaire 15(17,0%) chacun. les maladies oculaires courants étaient les troubles du cristallin 52(13,6%) et la conjonctive 46 (12,0%). le fait d'avoir fait des études supérieures ont protégé contre les maladies oculaires courant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Près d'un tiers des malades de la service ambulatoire général, Nigérian ont des maladies oculaires. Par conséquent, les soins oculaires primaires doivent être intégrés dans le service ambulatoire généra avec la fourniture de la main-d'œuvre et des installations nécessaires pour les soins a les malades d'ophtalmiques.

Mots-clés: Maladies oculaires, troubles oculaire, service ambulatoire général, Nigérian

Keywords: Eye diseases, eye disorders, general outpatient department, Nigeria


How to cite this article:
Onyiaorah AA, Kizor-Akaraiwe NN, Nwosu SN. Pattern of eye diseases in adults at the general outpatient clinic of a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2022;21:421-5

How to cite this URL:
Onyiaorah AA, Kizor-Akaraiwe NN, Nwosu SN. Pattern of eye diseases in adults at the general outpatient clinic of a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. Ann Afr Med [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 9];21:421-5. Available from: https://www.annalsafrmed.org/text.asp?2022/21/4/421/361256




   Introduction Top


The general outpatient department (GOPD) of a hospital is essentially the primary health-care section of a teaching hospital. Curative as well as preventive health-care services are offered for a wide range of diseases, including the eye disorders. The GOPD is the first point of contact for most patients presenting to a tertiary hospital. It is from the GOPD that patients are referred to other specialist clinics including the eye clinic.

Ophthalmic disorders have been reported among patients in general practice in Nigeria[1],[2] and in the United Kingdom.[3],[4] Different studies in general practice settings reported that conjunctivitis accounted for 32.9%,[1] 53.7%,[4] 59%,[3] and 73%.[5] Other common ocular conditions reported were cataract (1.8%,[5] 4.8%,[4] and 14.7%[1]), refractive errors (0.8%,[4] 9.9%,[1] and 17.3%[5]), and glaucoma (1.9%,[5] 2.3%,[4] and 5.3%[1]). The common complaints reported in a Nigerian[2] study were poor vision (39.2%), itching (26.6%), and red eye (8.0%). Some of these studies were done in primary health-care facility settings within communities. At present, the magnitude and pattern of eye diseases in the GOPD of many tertiary hospitals in Nigeria have not been reported.

This study was, therefore, conducted to obtain data on the incidence and pattern of eye diseases among patients presenting at the GOPD of a Nigerian teaching hospital. Information obtained would expectedly be useful in the formulation of necessary management guidelines for eye conditions in general medical practice.


   Materials and Methods Top


This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital Parklane, Enugu, Nigeria. Informed consent was also obtained from all the participants.

New adult patients who presented to the GOPD between June and August 2017, selected by systematic random sampling, were the subjects of this study. Available records from the GOPD showed that an average of 60 new patients were seen daily. Data collection for this study endured for 3 months. There are 60 working days in a 3-month period. This gives an estimated population size of 3600 patients.

Using the Leslie–Kish formula,[6] for population <10,000, the calculated minimum sample size at 95% confidence interval was 382. Given this minimum sample size and an estimated patients population of 3600, the interval for selection of patients by systematic random sampling technique was 9.

The first participant was, thus, randomly selected between numbers 1 and 9. Subsequent participants were selected in multiples of the number 9 until the desired sample size was achieved. Given the time it takes to interview and examine each participant, a maximum of 7 participants were examined each day.

All new patients presenting at the GOPD of ESUT Teaching Hospital, Parklane, Enugu, during the study period who gave consent were included in the study; excluded were very ill patients, old (follow up) patients and those who withheld consent.

Using a pre-tested, structured, questionnaire two trained interviewers obtained information on socio-demographics, ocular complaint, and previous eye disease from each participant. An inter-rater agreement between the interviewers was Kappa score of 0.8 was. Ocular examination was performed by an ophthalmologist using the ophthalmic equipment used in general practice setting. These were visual acuity assessment with the Snellen or illiterate E chart and pinhole occlude as applicable, anterior segment examination with a pen torch and a head-mounted magnifying loupe and direct ophthalmoscopy using the Welch Allyn ophthalmoscope for posterior segment examination.

Data obtained was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Analysis of variables included descriptive statistics such as means with standard deviation, frequencies, and percentages. The relationship between variables was tested using inferential statistics such as the χ2 or Fisher's exact test as applicable with alpha level at 0.05.

For the purpose of this study, the following definitions of important parameters were used:

  1. Glaucoma was defined as a vertical cup-disc ratio of ≥0.75 or an asymmetry of ≥0.2 between the two eyes.[7] This definition was used in this study based on direct ophthalmoscopic findings, the instrument expected to be used by the general practitioner for ocular examination
  2. Refractive error was defined as visual acuity of <6/12 which improved to 6/12 or better with the pinhole.[8] Again the definition is not comprehensive but since the general practitioner is not expected to perform refraction, pinhole acuity is a good screening tool for ametropia[9]
  3. Cataract was defined as any visible opacity of the crystalline lens[10]
  4. Age-related macular degeneration was be defined as presence of drusen or pigment disturbances with atrophy or hemorrhage at the macula in the absence of other known causes in those aged 50 years and above[10]
  5. Subconjunctival hemorrhage was defined as patch of blood under the conjunctiva
  6. Allergic conjunctivitis was defined when there was red eye, no pain, watery or serous discharge with moderate to severe itching[11]
  7. Infective conjunctivitis was defined as red with mild or no pain, more copious serous or mucopurulent discharge but mild or no itching[11]
  8. Pterygium was defined as a triangular, fleshy growth on the conjunctiva extending onto the cornea
  9. Corneal foreign body was defined as any foreign material embedded in the cornea
  10. Corneal ulcer was defined as a defect in the corneal epithelium with involvement of the underlying stroma. Staining was done with fluorescein
  11. Pseudophakia and aphakia were defined as absence of the crystalline lens from its anatomical location with and without intraocular lens respectively



   Results Top


Three hundred and eighty-two patients, made up of 124 (32.5%) male and 258 (67.5%) females participated in the study. The age range was 18–86 years. The mean age was 44.8 ± 15.4 years. The commonest age group was 51–60. The sociodemographic characteristics of participants are shown in [Table 1]. Three hundred and forty-two out of 382 (89.5%) had formal education with 142 (37.2%) attaining post-secondary education. Civil servants, 124 (32.4%) had the highest representation of all the occupations. Up to 234 (61.3%) of the patients were married. Two hundred and ninety-one (76.2%) patients were urban dwellers.
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics

Click here to view


Up to 112 (29.3%) patients had at least one eye disease, among which 55 (49.1%) had multiple eye diseases. Of these 112 patients, 88 (78.6%) actually complained of an eye problem. The common ocular complaints were poor vision 53 (60.2%), red eye 15 (17.0%), grittiness 15 (17.0%), itching 14 (15.9%), tearing 14 (15.9%), and pain 9 (10.2%).

The distribution of eye diseases is shown in [Table 2]. The eye diseases (according to anatomy) were lens disorders 52 (13.6%), conjunctival disorders 46 (12.0%), retina diseases 27 (7.1%), and ametropia 27 (7.1%). In terms of specific diagnosis, the most frequent eye diseases were cataract 50 (13.0%), pterygium 29 (7.5%), refractive errors 27 (7.1%), age-related macular degeneration 22 (5.8%), and glaucoma 12 (3.1%). These account for 46.6%, 25.9%, 24.1%, 19.6%, and 10.7%, respectively, of the 112 patients that had eye diseases. The presenting visual acuity in the better eye of participants is shown in [Table 3]; 344 (90.1%) patients had mild or no visual impairment while 7 (1.8%) patients were blind.
Table 2: Distribution of different eye diseases

Click here to view
Table 3: Presenting visual acuity in the better eye

Click here to view


The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and eye diseases is shown in [Table 4]. Increasing age and poor educational (less than or equal to primary school) status appears to be risk factors for having eye disease (P < 0.05). Of 112 participants in which eye diseases were detected, 64 (57.1%) were aged 50 years and above. Forty-nine out of 102 (48.0%) patients with primary education and below had eye disease compared with 63 out of 280 (22.5%) of those with secondary education and above.
Table 4: Eye disease and sociodemographic characteristics

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The results of our study suggest that 2 out of 3 patients seen at the GOPD were females. This, however, differed from other Nigerian studies by Scott and Ajaiyeoba[1] in Ibadan and Oladigbolu et al.[5] in Zaria where there were more males. A female preponderance was also observed in the two studies by Sheldrick et al. in Nottingham, United Kingdom.[4],[12] The female preponderance in the present study may be because of the hospital policy mandating all patients attending the gynecology and family planning clinics, (which are females' only clinics) to first pass through the GOPD. A comparison of age of patients in this study with those in similar studies within and outside Nigeria may be difficult as the age ranges of the studies were different since these studies[1],[4] involved both adults and children while we studied adults only. Persons aged >50 years constituted 40.6% of the participants with the 51–60 year age bracket alone accounting for nearly a quarter of the participants [Table 1]. It is thus not surprising that age-related and degenerative eye diseases accounting for 30.2% of the eye diseases [Table 2].

Majority of the patients had either secondary or postsecondary education. More than half of the patients were civil servants or traders and most patients (76.2%) were urban dwellers. These findings are not unexpected as the hospital is centrally located in Enugu metropolis, the capital of Enugu State with many institutions of higher learning, government offices, and large markets. This probably implies that many of the participants are sufficiently literate and enlightened to understand health information and may exhibit better health-seeking behavior. Furthermore, many of the participants would probably be better economically empowered and thus would be able to pay for health-care services. Services in the hospital are not free even for children.

The proportion of eye diseases found in the present study is higher than was obtained in studies on general practice patients in the United Kingdom,[3],[4] Egypt[14] and in Ibadan Nigeria.[1] This may be because in the United Kingdom and Egypt studies, ocular diagnosis was not made by an ophthalmologist but from clinical records of the general practitioners. In the Ibadan study,[1] though ocular diagnosis was made by an ophthalmologist, the study was conducted over two decades ago and the difference may be due to increased health awareness, through persistent health promotion activities and consequent improved health-seeking behavior with increase in attendance to hospital over the years.

The 29.3% incidence of eye diseases in the GOPD as found in the present study should be of interest to health service planners and administrators. Health workers must thus be prepared to adequately handle these patients, including treatment, and/or referral as appropriate. The finding of a significant proportion of patients with eye diseases in our study highlights a need for continued collaboration between the ophthalmologist and the general practitioner as well as support for the general practitioner in carrying out his role in eye care including the initial history, examination, diagnosis, treatment, and/or referral ophthalmic patients which is vital to the final outcome of the ocular problem.[15] This is especially necessary as 1 in 5 of these patients with eye disease did not complain about eye problem and it is known that consultation with a general practitioner creates an opportunity for screening of ocular diseases.[16],[17]

Unlike in the present study, other studies[1],[3],[4] reported that conjunctivitis was the commonest eye disease. This difference may be from patient selection because our study did not include children, in whom some diseases like allergic conjunctivitis occur more.[18] Glaucoma made up a higher proportion (10.7%) among eye diseases found in the present study compared to similar studies done within (5.3% and 1.9%)[1],[5] and outside (2.3%)[4] Nigeria. Although gonioscopy was not part of the tools of ocular assessment of the participants thus making it difficult to delineate participants into open or closed angle types, participants diagnosed with glaucoma were symptomless. This asymptomatic presentation is typical of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). The Nigerian National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey[7] documented the highest prevalence of POAG in South-East Nigeria; the present study was conducted in Enugu, South-East Nigeria. Therefore, all health workers especially in South-East Nigeria should be aware of this and refer appropriately to mitigate irreversible blindness.

The present study did not include children, and eye diseases, including glaucoma, are known to occur more with increasing age.[19] This difference in patient selection may also account for the higher proportion of age-related macular degeneration found in the present study, compared to another study.[4] Furthermore, another reflection of differences in patient selection is the finding that refractive error was lower in this study than was reported in other studies in Nigeria[1],[5] and higher than was reported in the United Kingdom[4] in which children were included unlike in our study. Proportions of the corneal and eye lid disorders found in the present study were similar to that reported in the United Kingdom.[4] This shows that these diseases are not very common in the populations studied.

The finding of lower eye disease rate among those with higher educational attainment may probably be because educated persons expectedly would be more health conscious, may afford care more, have better health-seeking behavior and may not wait till deterioration of their condition. Senyonjo et al.[2] similarly reported that the odds of having an eye disease increased with lower educational attainment. Our findings differed from a study in India[20] where female sex had significantly higher prevalence of ocular morbidities.


   Conclusion Top


Eye diseases are common among patients presenting to the GOPD, with cataract, pterygium, refractive errors, age-related macula degeneration, and glaucoma being the most common. General practitioners attending to these patients need to be aware of these and be equipped to treat the much they can and refer complex cases. A smooth practicable referral chain is desirable.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Scott SC, Ajaiyeoba AI. Eye diseases in general out-patient clinic in Ibadan. Niger J Med 2003;12:76-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Senyonjo L, Lindfield R, Mahmoud A, Kimani K, Sanda S, Schmidt E. Ocular morbidity and health seeking behaviour in Kwara state, Nigeria: Implications for delivery of eye care services. PLoS One 2014;9:e104128.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
McDonnell PJ. How do general practitioners manage eye disease in the community? Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:733-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sheldrick JH, Wilson AD, Vernon SA, Sheldrick CM. Management of ophthalmic disease in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1993;43:459-62.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Oladigbolu KK, Abah ER, Chinda D, Anyebe EE. Pattern of eye diseases in a university health service clinic in northern Nigeria. Niger J Med 2012;21:334-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
  [Full text]  
6.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med 2013;35:121-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
7.
Kyari F, Entekume G, Rabiu M, Spry P, Wormald R, Nolan W, et al. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: Results from the Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey. BMC Ophthalmol 2015;15:176.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Marmamula S, Keeffe JE, Narsaiah S, Khanna RC, Rao GN. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community. Clin Exp Optom 2014;97:523-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Schiefer U, Kraus C, Baumbach P, Ungewiß J, Michels R. Refractive errors. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016;113:693-702.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Neena J, Rachel J, Praveen V, Murthy GV; Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness India Study Group. Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in India. PLoS One 2008;3:e2867.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cronau H, Kankanala RR, Mauger T. Diagnosis and management of red eye in primary care. Am Fam Physician 2010;81:137-44.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sheldrick JH, Vernon SA, Wilson A, Read SJ. Demand incidence and episode rates of ophthalmic disease in a defined urban population. BMJ 1992;305:933-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
World Health Organization. Change the Definition of Blindness. Available from: https://www.who.int/blindness/Changethe. [Last accessed on 2021 Nov 04].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Aboulghate A, Abel G, Lyratzopoulos G, Abdelmohsen A, Hamed AR, Roland M. Patterns of disease presentation and management in Egyptian primary care: Findings from a survey of 2458 primary care patient consultations. BMC Fam Pract 2013;14:161.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Statham MO, Sharma A, Pane AR. Misdiagnosis of acute eye diseases by primary health care providers: Incidence and implications. Med J Aust 2008;189:402-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Vashist P, Singh S, Gupta N, Saxena R. Role of early screening for diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: An overview. Indian J Community Med 2011;36:247-52.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
17.
Long CA, Holden R, Mulkerrin E, Sykes D. Opportunistic screening of visual acuity of elderly patients attending outpatient clinics. Age Ageing 1991;20:392-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Nwosu SN. Childhood eye diseases in Anambra State, Nigeria. Niger J Ophthalmol 1999;7:34-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Abdull MM, Sivasubramaniam S, Murthy GV, Gilbert C, Abubakar T, Ezelum C, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: The Nigeria national blindness and visual impairment survey. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4114-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rajput RR, Pawar SR. Epidemiological profile of ocular morbidities in age group of 20 year and above at field practice area of rural health training center: A cross sectional study. Int J Community Med Public Health 2018;5:1481-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed206    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded6    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal