|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 233-237
Trends in intraoperative pain relief in anesthesized Nigerian pediatric patients: Implications for a developing economy
OP Adudu1, I Isa2, FO Longway2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||9-Sep-2011|
O P Adudu
Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin, Benin
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background : New drugs and new modalities for intraoperative pain relief is the current trend in pain management.
Aim : The study aims at examining the current trend in intraoperative pain relief in patients of pediatric age at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH) and its implications for a developing economy such as Nigeria.
Materials and Methods : A retrospective study of 652 patients of pediatric age undergoing various surgical procedures was carried out in UBTH, Nigeria from January 2006 to June 2008. The intraoperative pain relief methods were documented including demographic data, anesthetic technique, associated morbidities and outcome.
Results : Old generation opioid drugs and old modalities of pain relief including intravenous routes (573 i.e. 87.9%) and caudal blocks (46 i.e. 7.1%) were used in the intraoperative period in pediatric patients studied in UBTH. Adverse events of respiratory depression and hypotension including tachycardia and hypertension from ineffective analgesia were found in 14 patients (2.1%). The anesthetic technique was mainly general anesthesia for surgical procedures which were mainly laparotomies and urogenital surgeries.
Conclusion : The study revealed a lagging behind trend in intra-operative pain relief for pediatric surgical patients in UBTH. This has enormous implications of increased costs of drugs, equipment, facilities and the training and skills acquisition of physicians and other relevant health care personnel in the development ofpediatric acute pain service (PAPS) whose current trend worldwide is information technology based. This current trend also includes the increased use of regional blocks including nerve blocks. These avoid the side effects of conventional parenteral opioids and leads to improved patient safety and outcome.
| Abstract in French|| |
Arrière-plan : De nouveaux médicaments et nouvelles modalités pour soulager la douleur peropératoire est la tendance actuelle dans la gestion de la douleur. L'étude vise à examiner la tendance actuelle dans le soulagement de la douleur peropératoire chez les patients d'âge pédiatrique à l'Université de l'hôpital d'enseignement du Bénin (UBTH) et ses implications pour une économie en développement comme le Nigéria.
Méthode : Une étude rétrospective des 652 patients âge pédiatrique subissant diverses interventions chirurgicales a été réalisée en UBTH, Nigeria de janvier 2006 à juin 2008. Les méthodes de soulagement de la douleur peropératoire ont été documentées, y compris les données démographiques, la technique anesthésique, morbidités associées et résultat.
Résultats : Ancienne génération opioïdes médicaments et les vieux modalités de soulagement de la douleur, y compris les itinéraires par voie intraveineuse (573 soit 87,9%) et blocs caudales (46 soit 7,1%) ont été utilisés dans la période peropératoire chez les patients pédiatriques étudié dans UBTH. Événements indésirables de dépression respiratoire et une hypotension, y compris la tachycardie et l'hypertension d'analgésie inefficace ont été trouvés chez les 14 patients (2,1%). La technique d'anesthésie était principalement une anesthésie générale pour les interventions chirurgicales qui étaient principalement des laparotomies et des chirurgies urogénital.
Conclusion : L'étude a révélé un retard de développement derrière la tendance au soulagement de la douleur peropératoire pour les patients en chirurgie pédiatriques dans UBTH. Cela a des implications énormes de l'augmentation des coûts de médicaments, équipement, les installations et l'acquisition de compétences et la formation des médecins et des autres membres du personnel de santé pertinent dans le service de la douleur aiguë ofpediatric développement (PAPS) dont tendance actuelle dans le monde entier est la technologie de l'information fondée. Cette tendance actuelle comprend également l'utilisation accrue des blocs régionaux, y compris les blocs de nerf. Ces éviter les effets secondaires des opioïdes parentérale conventionnelles et conduit à améliorer la sécurité des patients et de résultats.
Mots clés : Période peropératoire, soulagement de la douleur, les tendances
Keywords: Intraoperative period, pain relief, trends
|How to cite this article:|
Adudu O P, Isa I, Longway F O. Trends in intraoperative pain relief in anesthesized Nigerian pediatric patients: Implications for a developing economy. Ann Afr Med 2011;10:233-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Adudu O P, Isa I, Longway F O. Trends in intraoperative pain relief in anesthesized Nigerian pediatric patients: Implications for a developing economy. Ann Afr Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 25];10:233-7. Available from: https://www.annalsafrmed.org/text.asp?2011/10/3/233/84707
| Introduction|| |
Acute pain management for surgical patients intra and postoperatively is important for patient comfort. It leads to an improved perioperative experience and reduction in pulmonary complications. , This results in reduced hospital costs due to shorter hospital stay especially in ambulatory surgical patients. ,
Currently available are new drugs for intraoperative pain relief such as remifentanil  and the use of new modes of pain relief such as the administration of systemic local anesthetics such as lignocaine which has antiinflammatory modulatory properties.  Also, there is new sophistry in prescription orders in administering analgesia such as parent controlled analgesia  and automated anesthesia information management systems.  These have led to prompt, safe, and effective intraoperative pain management worldwide. Computerized physician order of prescriptions  and patient clinical information are a part of automated anesthesia information management systems. Furthermore, the utilization of acute pain service facilities has ensured that the gains of effective intraoperative pain management continued into the postoperative period for surgical patients. 
The new modalities for acute pain management are not available in the sub-region including organized acute pain service.  The study therefore set out to examine the intraoperative pain relief practices in our centre, UBTH, in Nigeria. An organized acute pain service for pediatric surgical patients can be developed within the limits of available manpower and technology in Nigeria. This study therefore focuses on the trends in intraoperative analgesia in anesthesized children and its implications for a developing economy such as ours.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The retrospective cohort study of pediatric surgical patients on trends in their intraoperative analgesia was carried out in UBTH from January 2006 to June 2008. The anesthetic charts and case notes of the pediatric surgical patients were selected and examined. The pediatric age used for the study was the legal definition of 17 years and below. Demographic data, method of intraoperative pain relief used, associated morbidity and complications, surgical procedure, and anesthetic management including technique were documented. Data were subjected to statistical tests using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) with the level of significance set at 0.05.
| Results|| |
Six hundred and fifty two surgical patients of age 0-17 years were studied. They include 440 males (67.5%) and 212 females (32.5%). The mean age of the pediatric surgical patients was 5.39 ± 2.32 years [Table 1].
The surgical procedures carried out in the 652 pediatric patients in the study was a total of 670 and include herniotomies (106 i.e. 15.8%), plastic and orthopedic surgery (107 i.e. 16.0%), excisions including biopsies (81 i.e. 12.1%), appendisectomies (62 i.e. 9.3%), urethroplasties, nephrectomies, and pyeloplasty (54 i.e. 8.1%), ear, nose, and throat surgery (44 i.e. 6.6%), maxillofacial surgery including cleft lip (40 i.e. 6.0%), colostomies including closures (27 i.e. 4.0%), cardiothoracic surgeries including oesophagoscopies (18 i.e. 2.7%), neurosurgeries including neurodiagnostic procedures such as CT scans (31 i.e. 4.6%), laryngoscopies, and foreign body removal (13 i.e.1.9%), skin graft (18 i.e. 2.7%), omphalocoele repair (14 i.e. 2.0%), anoplasty (15 i.e. 2.2%), and unspecified surgeries (40 i.e. 6.0%). Multiple surgical procedures was carried out in some patients.
The pain relief methods used in the intraoperative period for the study patients were mainly parenteral opioids (573 i.e. 87.9%) and regional blocks mainly caudal blocks (46 i.e. 7.1%) [Table 2].
|Table 2: Intraoperative pain relief prescriptions and effectiveness in study patients|
Click here to view
The other methods of pain relief used include parenteral ketamine (17 i.e. 2.6%), ketorolac (4 i.e. 0.6%), local infiltration using 1% lignocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine (6 i.e. 0.9%), and oral and parenteral paracetamol (2 i.e. 0.3%).
Multimodal methods of pain relief were used in some patients.
There was no evidence of the use of infusion pumps for pain relief or of the use of computerized orders for physician prescriptions. There were no automated anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) for use for pain relief in pediatric surgical patients.
The morbidities associated with modalities of pain relief used were found to be significant in 14 patients (2.1%) and are as shown in [Table 3] and [Table 4] (χ2 = 11.13, P < 0.05, df = 2).
|Table 3: Morbidity and complications associated with intraoperative pain relief methods|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Comparison of morbidity in patients with and patients without morbidity|
Click here to view
The anesthetic technique used was mainly general anesthesia in 650 patients (99.6%) which includes the concomitant use of regional analgesia in 46 patients which had to be established under general anesthesia in young pediatric patients, and, two solely spinal anesthetic technique in two older children (0.31%).
| Discussion|| |
The current trend in intraoperative pain relief in the pediatric patients studied revealed that parenteral methods were still the mainstay of acute pain management. However, there is a paradigm shift from the use of intramuscular route  to the use of intravenous route (87.9%) for analgesic drug administration.
Furthermore, we found an increase in the use of regional blocks mainly caudal blocks for acute pain management in these patients.  The drugs used have remained old conventional opioids. 
This trend in the study lags behind the current worldwide trend of new sophistry in the use of new generation drugs such as remifentanil and new modalities for drug administration including infusion pumps and controlled analgesia machines by patients (older children), parents (especially in children with disabilities) and nurses. The new use of intravenous lignocaine,  and fascia iliaca nerve blocks  for pain relief is also of current interest.  In addition, the trend for improved safety of drug administration using computerized systems reduces medical errors in drug administration. 
The implication of establishing the current trend for intraoperative pain relief in pediatric patients is enormous costs in terms of equipment, drugs and facilities to be used. It is however, cost effective as it improves socioeconomic life.
Also, the training of physician personnel, pharmacists, and nurses on information technology is essential for the development of a modern intraoperative pain management. The finding in the study that the use of regional blocks which is an area of current focus in acute pain management, is low, is worrisome. The increased use of regional blocks for intraoperative pain relief reduces the incidence of side effects of drugs used in the conventional methods of pain relief with decreased morbidity and shorter hospital stay. It has important implications as an incidence in morbidity of 2.1% was found to be significantly associated with the pain relief methods used in the study (c2 = 11.13, P < 0.05, df = 2).
Anesthetists need to be encouraged to use regional blocks for the safety and improved outcome in patients.
The limitations of the study include incomplete data especially on the rescue interventions made in the course of management of morbidity associated with intraoperative pain relief. It does not however diminish our findings in the study that intraoperative pain relief (acute pain management) in anesthesized pediatric patients were mainly parenteral methods although the mode had shifted from intramuscular to intravenous drug administration of old conventional opioids.
| Conclusion|| |
Current intraoperative pain relief practices were mainly conventional old generation opioid drugs such as pethidine, fentanyl, etc. administered intravenously. Also, old generation local anesthetic drugs such as bupivacaine were administered in the caudal and subarachnoid spaces. New opioid drugs such as remifentanil, new local anesthetics such as ropivacaine and new modes of drug delivery of analgesic drugs such as controlled analgesia machines by patients, parents and nurses via intravenous and epidural routes were not used.
The implications of this lagging behind trend found in our study for the development of an efficacious and cost-effective intraoperative pain relief for pediatric patients is enormous in terms of costs for equipment, drugs, facilities, and personnel development. Its benefits of safety, improved outcome, reduced hospital stay, and improved socioeconomic life with less disruption of family and school life outweighs its high cost.
| References|| |
|1.||Duedahl TH, Hansen E H. A qualitative systematic review of morphine treatment in children with postoperative pain. Paediatr Anaesth 2007;17:756-74. |
|2.||Dolin SJ, Cashman JN. Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: Nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus and urinary retention. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:584-91. |
|3.||Chung F., Mezei G. Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anaesth Analg 1999;89:1352-9. |
|4.||Shaikh S, Chung F, Imarengiaye C, Yung D, Bernstein M. Pain, nausea, vomiting and ocular complications delay discharge following ambulatory microdisectomy. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:514-8. |
|5.||Hinova A, Fernando R. Systematic remifentanil for labor analgesia. Anaesth Analg 2009;,109;:1925-9. |
|6.||Hollmann MW, Durieux M.E. Local anaesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication ? Anaesthesiology 2000;93:858-75. |
|7.||Voepel-Lewis T, Marinkovic A, Kostrzewa A, Tait AR, Malviya S. The prevalence of and risk factors for adverse events in children receiving patient controlled analgesia by proxy or patient controlled analgesia after surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;,107:70-5. |
|8.||Shulman R, Singer M, Goldstone J, Bellingan G. Medication errors: A prospective cohort study of handwritten and computerized physician order entry in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care 2005,9: R516-21. |
|9.||Ali J, Barrow L, Vuylsteke A. The impact of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices in a cardio- thoracic Intensive Care Unit. Anaesthesia 2010;65:119-23. |
|10.||Adudu OP, Adudu OG. Mothers' attitude to caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Afr J Anaesth Int Care 2003;,4;11-6. |
|11.||Adudu O.P., Kolawole I., Eboh T. Awareness about acute pain service in paediatric patients among anaesthesia residents in Nigeria, a developing country. J Med Biomed Res 2010, 9 : 33-41. |
|12.||Calodney AK, Childhood Pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 1991;4:707-11. |
|13.||Lako SJ, Steegers MA, van Egmund J, Gardeniers J, Staals LM, van Geffen GJ. Incisional continuos fascia iliaca block provide more effective pain relief and fewer side effects than opioids after pelvic osteotomy in children. Anaesth Analg 2009; 109,:1799-803. |
|14.||Dadure C, Capdevilla X. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in children. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005;19:309-21. |
|15.||Mowbray WJ, Gaukroger PB. Long term patient controlled analgesia in children. Anaesthesi1990; 45: 941-3. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]