Annals of African Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2011  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 139--143

Underweight, overweight and obesity in adults Nigerians living in rural and urban communities of Benue State


Adediran O Sola1, Adeniyi O Steven2, Jimoh A Kayode3, Alao O Olayinka4,  
1 Department of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria
2 Department of Physiology, College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria
3 Department of Pathology, Federal Medical Centre, Ido-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
4 Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Jimoh A Kayode
Department of Pathology, Federal Medical Centre, Ido-Ekiti, Ekiti State
Nigeria

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity among Nigerians aged 18-45 years, living in urban and rural settlements in one state in Nigeria. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-five subjects between 18 and 45 years of age were recruited for height, weight and waist circumference (WC) measurements. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated (weight/height 2, kg/m 2 ); WHO criteria determined BMI and WC categories. Results: Based on BMI, about 2% of the study population was underweight, 22% was overweight and 4% was obese. There were more normal weight persons in rural than in urban settlement. About 40 and 30% of females in urban and rural settlement, respectively, were either overweight or obese. Based on WC of the sample population, 10.34% had increased risk for metabolic syndrome [action level I (defi ned as WC ≥94 cm in men and ≥80 cm in women)] and 2.8% had substantially increased risk [action level II (defi ned as WC ≥102 cm in men and ≥88 cm in women)]. At action level II, there was no obese male. Conclusion: This study revealed that underweight, overweight and obesity exist in young adults, but overweight and obesity are more prevalent. Therefore, concerted efforts should be made to control this in young adults for their present well-being and to possibly avoid the risk of disease later in life.



How to cite this article:
Sola AO, Steven AO, Kayode JA, Olayinka AO. Underweight, overweight and obesity in adults Nigerians living in rural and urban communities of Benue State.Ann Afr Med 2011;10:139-143


How to cite this URL:
Sola AO, Steven AO, Kayode JA, Olayinka AO. Underweight, overweight and obesity in adults Nigerians living in rural and urban communities of Benue State. Ann Afr Med [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 21 ];10:139-143
Available from: http://www.annalsafrmed.org/text.asp?2011/10/2/139/82081


Full Text

 Introduction



The people of Africa are often thought of as being hungry and thin. However, overweight and obesity (as defined by the WHO) are becoming more common in poor and middle-income countries. [1],[2],[3] These conditions increase the risk of arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, dyslipidemia and Type-2 diabetes.

Studies to determine the prevalence of obesity have been conducted in several parts of Nigeria, [4],[5],[6] but there is little information about the prevalence of obesity in adult Nigerians living in rural areas of the country. This study was carried out to determine the prevalence of obesity based on body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) among adults in rural (Adikpo) and Urban (Makurdi) communities of Benue State located in the middle belt region of Nigeria, where much agricultural activity is being carried out.

 Materials and Methods



A meeting was held with the community leaders on the purpose of the study and their subjects were adequately informed. Each subject gave a written consent, and where applicable, verbal consent was given after thorough understanding of the procedure. The Ethical Committee of Benue State University gave its clearance before the study commenced. One hundred and eighty-nine adults in the age bracket of 18-45 years from a rural community (Adikpo) and 246 adults of the same age bracket from an urban community (Makurdi), both in Benue State, Nigeria, were recruited for this study. In the rural settlement, the community had six subdivisions commonly referred to as quarters; about 30 subjects were randomly recruited from each quarter for this study. For the purpose of this study, the urban area (Makurdi) was subdivided into 24 quarters and at least 10 subjects, which comprised males and females, were randomly recruited for the study.

Measurement of body fat

Standardized measures were taken of height using portable stadiometers and weight using Salter electronic scales (model numbers 9028SV3R). The protocols for these measures were taken from the World Health Organization manual. [7] Standing height was measured without shoes, in the Frankfort horizontal plane and at full stretch, to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg. BMI was derived as weight (kg)/height (m) 2 . WC was measured at the narrowest part of the torso as seen from the front, measured midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest using a non-stretchable tape.

Definition of cut-off

Overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity were classified according to WHO criteria. Abdominal obesity (WC) cut-off was based on WHO action levels. At action level I defined as increased risk for metabolic syndrome, WC of ≥94 cm for men and ≥80 cm for women was used, while for action level II defined as substantially increased risk for metabolic syndrome, WC of ≥102 cm for men and ≥88 cm for women was used. [7],[8]

Method of data analysis

The data generated were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The differences between the mean age, weight, height, BMI and WC were determined using independent sample Student's t-test. All data analysis was performed using SPSS statistical package (version 15.0) and the level of statistical significance for analysis was set at P < 0.05.

 Results



Mean anthropometric, body mass index and waist circumference in sample population

Four hundred and thirty-five adults comprising 298 males and 137 females of age between 18 and 45 years were studied. The mean age of the studied population was 24.2 ΁ 0.2 years. As shown in [Table 1], there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the observed anthropometric data of residents of urban and rural communities.{Table 1}

Based on BMI classification, about 2% of the sample population was underweight, 72% was of normal weight, 22% was overweight and 4% was obese. As shown in [Table 2] and [Figure 1], there were more obese individuals in rural than in urban settlements.{Figure 1}{Table 2}

Based on WC, at action level I, 10.3% of the studied population had abdominal obesity. Increased risk for metabolic syndrome (action level I) was higher in rural (11.6%) than in urban (9.3%) settlement. At action level II, 2.8% of the studied population had abdominal obesity, as shown in [Table 2].

Mean anthropometric, body mass index and waist circumference in sample population based on sex

[Table 3] shows that there was no significant difference in the age and height of males and females in the sample population studied (P > 0.05), but the weight and WC were significantly higher (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), while the BMI was significantly higher in females than in males (P < 0.05).{Table 3}

Based on BMI, there was no underweight among the males studied in rural settlement of Makurdi. Overweight was higher in urban males and females, and there were more obese females in urban (8.3%) than in rural (5.2%) settlement, but obesity among males was higher in rural (3.6%) than in urban (2.2%) settlement as shown in [Table 4].{Table 4}

In [Table 4] it is also seen that based on WC, less than 3% of males in both settlements, and 31.7 and 24.7% of females in urban and rural settlements, respectively, were at increased risk of metabolic syndrome (action level I). About 11.7 and 6.5% of females in urban and rural settlements, respectively, are at substantially increased risk of metabolic syndrome (action level II).

 Discussion



The results of this study reveal that underweight, overweight and obesity existed in the studied population. Based on BMI, more than a quarter (26%) of the total population studied was either overweight or obese while 1.8% of the population was underweight. The percentage of obese individuals in this population was lower than those studied in Edo State [9] and in suburban northern Nigeria, [10] although they did not report the age bracket of the population they studied. The rural community tends to be more actively involved in farming than people in urban areas who do more of office work and hence are more sedentary. Higher number of overweight and obesity in urban settlement has been attributed to nutritional transition, i.e. the shift from a diet of simple and, sometimes, traditional foods with little variation to a diet more reliant on processed foods, animal-source foods, fat, and sugar. [11],[12]

The prevalence of obesity between both sexes was lower in this study than that reported by Bakari. [10] Only 55% of females living in the urban area had normal weight and 40% were either overweight or obese. Obesity appears to be a problem of urban women. In South Africa, 56% of females are reported to be obese, [13] and 32.6% are reported to be obese among the urban women of Gambia. [14]

The association between urbanization and obesity in people of West African origin has been documented, [15] although it is not clear why this association is more marked among women. This sexual dimorphism may point to behavioral factors because most males and females are exposed to the same environmental factors. Moreover, it is believed in some parts of Africa that being fat is a sign of affluence.

WC is an aggregate measurement of the actual amount of total and abdominal fat accumulation; it is a crucial correlate of abnormal syndromes found among obese and overweight patients. [16] Indeed, many are now advocating WC as a valid alternative to BMI for health promotion and the basis for alert values for those at risk of cardiovascular diseases. [17],[18],[19] About 10% of the studied population has WC above normal, a value lower than that reported in Rivers State, Nigeria, where 31.7 and 16.9% were obese based on WC in Okrika and Port Harcourt, respectively. [6] Rivers State is one of the oil producing states in the country, and thus being one of the richest states may account for this difference.

There is no consensus on the WC cut-off points for abdominal adiposity. The most commonly cited cut-off points for abdominal adiposity were developed for health promotion purposes to give optimal enlightenment of individuals in need of weight management because of overweight/obesity or because of central fat distribution. The cut-off points were proposed originally by Lean et al, [20] and subsequently by Han et al, [8] at level I (increased risk for metabolic syndrome), lifestyle modifications were recommended, while at level II (substantially increased risk for metabolic syndrome), professional help is required.

Mortality and morbidity ratio varies with the distribution of body fat, with the highest risk linked to excessive abdominal fat, usually called central obesity or android/visceral obesity. [21],[22] Studies indicate that intra-abdominal fat/android obesity (characterized by increased WC) is associated with an increased risk for a number of diseases, including cardiovascular diseases (CVD), Type-2 diabetes mellitus, and gall bladder disease. The importance of this research lies in the fact that the population studied is within the age range of 18-45 years, with a mean age of 24 years. Although underweight, overweight and obesity were observed, overweight and obesity appears to be of concern, especially in urban females, because obesity predisposes them now and in the future to diseases. [9]

In conclusion, underweight, overweight and obesity existed in the studied population, but the prevalence of overweight and obesity appears to be high. Therefore, obesity at these ages is not only prevalent in an affluent country, but also prevalent in a developing country which calls for public concern.

References

1Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet 2005;366:1197-1209.
2Misra A, Khurana L. Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome in Developing Countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:s9-30.
3Hossain P, Kawar B, Nahas EM. Obesity and Diabetes in the Developing World-A Growing Challenge. N Engl J Med 2007;356:213-5.
4Afolabi WA, Addo AA, Sonibare MA. Activity pattern, energy intake and obesity among Nigerian urban market women. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2004;55:85-90.
5Ben-Bassey UP, Oduwole AO, Ogundipe OO. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Eti-Osa LGA, Lagos, Nigeria. Obes Rev 2007;8:475-9.
6Siminialayi IM, Emem-Chioma PC, Dapper DV. The Prevalence of Obesity as Indicated by BMI and Waist Circumference among Nigerian Adults Attending Family Medicine Clinics as Outpatients in Rivers State. Niger J Med 2008;17:340-5.
7WHO. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on Obesity, Geneva; 1997. p. 1-276.
8Han TS, Van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: Prevalence study in a random sample. Br Med J 1995;311:1401-5.
9Ibhazehiebo K, Dimkpa U, Iyawe VI. Hypertension, and Blood Pressure Response to Graded Exercise in Young Obese and Non- Athletic Nigerian University Students. Niger J Physiol Sci 2007;22:37-42.
10Bakari AG, Onyemelukwe GC, Sani BG, Aliyu IS, Hassan SS, Aliyu TM. Obesity, overweight and underweight in suburban northern Nigeria. Int J Diabetes Metabol 2007;15:68-9.
11Popkin BM. The nutrition transition and obesity in the developing world. J Nutr 2001;131:S871-3.
12Chris B. IFPRI. Obesity in Developing Countries: People are Overweight But Still Not Well Nourished. Available from: http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/04/global/burslem.htm. [Last accessed on 2008 July 5].
13Nullis C. Obesity worsens chronic disease burden in Africa. Obesity Discussion Forum. Obesity Discussion.com 2006.
14van der Sande MA, Ceesay SM, Milligan PJ, Nyan OA, Banya WA, McAdam KP, et al. Obesity and Undernutrition and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Rural and Urban Gambian Communities. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1641-4.
15Wilks R, McFarlane-Anderson N, Bennett F, Obesity in peoples of the African diaspora. Ciba Found Symp 1996;201:37-53.
16Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, Evans DJ, Hartz AJ, Kalkhoff RK. Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982;54:254-60.
17Han TS, Tijhuis MA, Lean ME, Seidell JC. Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1814-20.
18Adediran SO, Edo AE, Jimoh AK, Ohwovoriole. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Nigerians with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Int 2007;15:13-4.
19Jimoh AK, Adediran OS, Agboola SM, Tomi-Olugbodi D, Idowu AA, Adebisi SA, et al. A Study of Correlation between Derived and Basic Anthropometric Indices In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Euro J Sci Res 2009;36:437-44.
20Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. Br Med J 1995;311:158-61.
21Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Nadeau A. Visceral obesity in men. Associations with glucose tolerance, plasma insulin and lipoprotein levels. Diabetes 1992;41:826-34.
22Sugerman H, Windsor A, Bessos M, Wolfe L. Intra-abdominal pressure, sagittal abdominal diameter and obesity comorbidity. J Intern Med 1997;241:71-9.