Annals of African Medicine
Home About AAM Editorial board Ahead of print Current Issue Archives Instructions Subscribe Contact us Search Login 


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 165-170  

Corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria


Department of Ophthalmology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika-Zaria, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication5-Sep-2013

Correspondence Address:
Kehinde Oladigbolu
Department of Ophthalmology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika-Zaria
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1596-3519.117626

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background/Objective: To highlight the pattern of corneal ulcers at the Guinness Ophthalmic Unit, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of case notes of patients who presented with corneal ulcer at the Guinness Ophthalmic Unit, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital between January 1995 and December 2005. Information obtained include demographic data, presenting complaints, predisposing factors, microbiological diagnosis, use of orthodox or traditional medications before presentation, duration before presentation and, presenting and final visual acuity.
Results: A total of 228 cases presented within the 10 years study period. There were 129 (56.6%) males and 99 (43.4%) females. The age range was 15 months to 66 years. The commonest presenting complaints was poor vision 109 (47.8%) followed by lacrimation 97 (42.5%) and ocular pains 96 (42.1%). The common predisposing factors were trauma 117 (51.3%), use of traditional eye medications 39 (17.1%), self medication with topical steroids 13 (5.7%) and measles 9 (4.0%). The presenting visual acuity was <6/60 in 49.8% of the patients, <6/18-6/60 in 23.4%, and 6/6-6/18 in 25.5% of the patients. At discharge, 45.6% had a visual acuity of 6/6-6/18, 27.2% had borderline vision (<6/18-6/60), 18.0% had severe visual impairment (<6/60), while 6.6% had no light perception. The commonest organisms isolated were Staphylococcus aureus in 19.7%, fungal hyphae in 15.8% and Streptococcus pneumoniae in 4.8%.
Conclusion: In this study most patients with corneal ulcer presented with poor vision and excessive lacrimation. Trauma was the commonest predisposing factor with bacterial organisms as the commonest isolate.

   Abstract in French 

Contexte/objectif: à rehausser le motif des ulcères cornéens à la Guinness ophtalmique unité, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigéria.
Méthodes et matériaux: Un examen rétrospectif des notes de cas de patients qui présentent un ulcère cornéen à la Guinness ophtalmique unité, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital entre janvier 1995 et décembre 2005. Renseignements obtenus comprennent des données démographiques, présentant des plaintes, en prédisposant des facteurs, diagnostic microbiologique, utilisation des orthodoxes ou des médicaments traditionnels avant présentation, durée avant et de présentation, présentation et définitive l'acuité visuelle.
Résultats: A total de 228 cas présenté dans le délai d'étude de 10 ans. Il y avait 129 (56,6 %) hommes et 99 (43,4 %) femmes. La tranche d'âge était de 15 mois à 66 ans. Les plaintes de présentation plus fréquentes a été mauvaise vision 109 (47,8 %) suivie de larmoiement 97 (42,5 %) et des douleurs oculaires 96 (42,1 %). Les facteurs prédisposants communs étaient un traumatisme 117 (51,3 %), utilisation de médicaments pour les yeux traditionnels 39 (17,1 %), auto médication avec des stéroïdes topiques 13 (5,7 %) et la rougeole 9 (4,0 %). L'acuité visuelle présente a < 6/60 à 49,8 % des patients, < 6/18-6/60 à 23,4 % et 6/6-6/18 dans 25,5 % des patients. À la décharge, 45,6 % avaient une acuité visuelle de 6/6-6/18, 27,2 % avaient une vision borderline (< 6/18-6/60), 18,0 % avaient une déficience visuelle grave (< 6/60), alors que 6,6 % n'avaient aucune perception lumineuse. Les plus fréquentes organismes isolés étaient Staphylococcus aureus dans 19,7 %, les hyphes fongiques dans 15,8 % et Streptococcus pneumoniae dans 4,8 %.
Conclusion: Dans cette étude la plupart des patients ayant un ulcère cornéen présenté une vision pauvre et larmoiement excessif. Traumatisme a été le facteur prédisposant plus fréquente avec les organismes bactériens comme l'isolat plus fréquente.
Mots-clés: Ulcères cornéens, prédisposant des facteurs, résultat visuel

Keywords: Corneal ulcers, predisposing factors, visual outcome


How to cite this article:
Oladigbolu K, Rafindadi A, Abah E, Samaila E. Corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2013;12:165-70

How to cite this URL:
Oladigbolu K, Rafindadi A, Abah E, Samaila E. Corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 20];12:165-70. Available from: http://www.annalsafrmed.org/text.asp?2013/12/3/165/117626


   Introduction Top


Corneal ulceration is a significant cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Corneal opacification is the second most common cause of monocular blindness after un-operated cataract in some developing countries. [1],[2] The epidemiologic pattern, aetiology and predisposing factors vary in different parts of the world and even from region to region within the same country. Studies have reported incidence of microbial keratitis as low as 11/100,000 persons/year in the US to as high as 799/100,000 persons/year in some developing countries. Ashaye et al. reported that 26.7% of cases of corneal opacity are due to microbial keratitis in Ibadan, Nigeria. [3],[4]

Despite the fact that many pathogens can cause infectious corneal lesions and that many corneal ulcers are secondary to non-infectious processes, generally the term corneal ulcer is used in the context of bacterial infectious keratitis. Strictly speaking, corneal ulcer is considered as any loss of superficial corneal tissue due to necrosis secondary to an infective process. [5] Almost any organism can invade the corneal stroma if the normal corneal defence mechanism i.e. lids, tear film and corneal epithelium are compromised. However, some organisms penetrate intact epithelium. These are  Neisseria More Details gonorrhoeae, Corynebacteriium diphteriae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.[1],[6]

While viral infections are the leading causes of corneal ulcer in the developed nations (with acanthamoeba infections in contact lens wearers); bacteria, fungi and acanthamoeba are important aetiological agents in the developing world. [1],[6],[7] The common predisposing factors are ocular trauma (which may be trivial in some cases), traditional eye medications, and measles in children. [6],[8],[9],[10]

This report is a 10 year review of the pattern of clinical presentation, predisposing factors and treatment outcome of corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria.


   Materials and Methods Top


This is a retrospective study. The case records of all patients who presented with corneal ulcers between January 1995 and December 2005 (10 year period) at the Guinness Ophthalmic Unit, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital were reviewed after approval by the Ethical Review Board of the institution. Information collected from the patients' records included demographic data, presenting complaints, presence of predisposing factors, microbiological diagnosis, duration before presentation and, presenting and discharge visual acuity.

Case records without clinical diagnosis of corneal ulcer by the attending doctor and those with chemical burns were excluded.

The results were analyzed using Analyse-It version 2.12 statistical software.


   Results Top


A total of 228 clinically diagnosed cases of corneal ulcer who presented during the 10 year period were reviewed. Eleven patients had bilateral involvement, thus making a total of 239 eyes. Three cases of chemical burns were excluded. There were 129 (56.6%) males and 99 (43.3%) females. The age range was 15 months to 66 years [Figure 1]. Majority of the patients were students (32.0%) [Table 1].
Figure 1: Age and sex distribution of patients

Click here to view
Table 1: Occupation of patients

Click here to view


Most patients had multiple presenting complaints with poor vision being the commonest in 109 patients (47.8%) [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Presenting complaints in patients

Click here to view


Ocular trauma from varying causes was the predisposing factor in 51.3% of the patients. The use of traditional eye medicines (TEM) was a predisposing factor in 17.1% and self medication with topical steroid/steroid-antibiotic preparations in 5.7% of the patients. Measles was the identified predisposing factor in 9 children (4.0%), 6 of whom were not immunised. An undergraduate developed corneal ulcer from the use of contact lens (0.4%). The predisposing factor could not be ascertained in 21.5% of patients [Table 2].
Table 2: Factors predisposing to corneal ulcers

Click here to view


The presenting visual acuity was <6/60 in 44.4% of the patients, 23.4% had <6/18-6/60 and 25.5% of patients had a visual acuity of 6/6-6/18. No light perception (NLP) was recorded in 12 (5.4%) of the patients [Table 3].
Table 3: Presenting and post-treatment visual acuity (affected eyes)

Click here to view


Corneal scraping was done in 169 patients (74.1%) with 58.0% culture positive [Figure 3]. Sixteen eyes (6.7%) had dendritic ulcers presumed to be due to herpes simplex virus. Mooren's ulcer was diagnosed in eight eyes (3.3%) with peripheral ulcers based on clinical appearance and history.
Figure 3: Causative Organisms in patients

Click here to view


The duration prior to hospital presentation ranged from <12 hours to >2 weeks. Presentation was <1 week in students, civil servants and preschool children, while housewives and farmers presented >1 week after onset of symptoms.

Hospital admission ranged between 4-19 days. At discharge, 45.6% had a visual acuity of 6/6-6/18, 27.2% had borderline vision (<6/18-6/60), 18.0% had severe visual impairment (6/60), while 6.6% had no light perception. A significant proportion of the patients (49.6%) healed with corneal opacity after treatment [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Ocular complications in patients

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In this study, more than half of the patients were males (56.6%) and majority below the age of 40 years. This finding is similar to studies in other parts of Nigeria, [4],[8],[9],[10] Africa [11] and East India. [12] This is probably due to the fact that more males are engaged in outdoor works than the females. Also, women in this part of the country often stay indoors and depend on their husband for finance and decision making even during sickness, thus depriving them of medical care, including eye care. Other workers have similar impression. [13],[14],[15] About a third of the patients were farmers and artisans (31.6%) who are more predisposed to ocular injury at work. Children are more likely to be exposed to ocular trauma especially during unsupervised play [16] as well as disease conditions like measles which has corneal complications.

Poor vision was the most frequent presenting complaints; this would be due to the associated haziness and oedema of the cornea that occurs around the ulcer especially if centrally located. In different parts of the world, predisposing factors to corneal ulcers varies from region to region. Most corneal ulcers in the developing world occur after relatively minor corneal trauma. [13] Ocular trauma was the commonest in this study. This is similar to the experience elsewhere. [4],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[14] Vegetable matter was responsible for most of the injuries especially in farmers (n=23). Students are likely to sustain injuries while playing or during sports and manual labour.

Severe corneal ulceration following measles was a common condition throughout sub-Saharan Africa in the 60s and 70s. [15] The prevalence then was as high as 44-81%. Sandford-Smith et al. reported prevalence of 42% in Kaduna in the 70s. [17] Onabolu in 1986 reported a prevalence of 16.6% of post measles keratopathy. [18] The trend has changed significantly over the years as shown by the low prevalence of 4.0% in this study. Study by Nwosu et al. in Eastern Nigeria [8] reported no case of measles-related corneal ulcer. The present low prevalence of measles-related corneal ulcer is not unconnected with the wider coverage by the National Immunization Programme. Although in some parts of Northern Nigeria, some people refuse to accept immunization for cultural and religious reasons. Six of the nine children with measles ulcerative keratitis in this study were not immunized.

All patients who presented to the hospital after 2 weeks (n=36; 15.8%) of onset of symptoms had either used traditional eye medicines or topical steroid-antibiotic preparations or both. This could be because traditional healers are well patronized as alternative source of medical care in Nigeria. Also, there is ready availability of patent medicine dealers who assume the role of an "all-round general medical practitioner, dealer chemist and dispenser in one". Another reason that could account for the indiscriminate self-medication could be lack of finance by rural dwellers to travel to the facility where a qualified Ophthalmologist is located and to pay hospital bills. Studies in other parts of Nigeria and rural Malawi reported that 19.5-34.0% of patients with corneal ulcer had used TEM or steroid preparations before presentation. [8],[10],[19]

Unlike other studies in Nigeria [6],[8],[9],[10] that reported no case of contact lens-related corneal ulcer, a female undergraduate student had corneal ulcer from contact lens (CL) use in our study. The cause was probably due to poor maintenance of the CL or cleaning solution. The prevalence in developed countries could be as high as 30%. [20] Studies in Singapore, Malaysia and India have reported gram negative organisms isolated from CL storage case wells and CL solution and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the commonest organism (71.4-79.7%). The risk is higher in soft CL-wearers as well as overnight use of any CL compared to daily use. [21],[22],[23]

The spectrum of microbial pathogens producing ulceration varies from population to population as shown by large studies in Asia and Africa. Significantly, the most common bacteria pathogen causing corneal ulceration in the majority of these studies was Streptococcus pneumoniae.[1],[2],[7] Bacteria keratitis was the commonest form of corneal ulcer in this study with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as common pathogens isolated in descending order of frequency. This is similar to findings by Nwosu et al. in Onisha, [8] Olawoye et al. in Ibadan [6] and Chaha in Kaduna. [24] A similar work by Onabolu [18] at the study centre in 1986 reported Staphylococcus aureus as the most common cultured organism, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Nisseria gonorrhoea. Studies done in South India and Ghana showed a different pattern with Streptococcus pneumonia being the most common. [7],[25]

We found a relatively high incidence (15.8%) of mycotic corneal ulcer which could be explained by the high number of ocular injuries caused by vegetation related materials in farmers and students. Similar observations were made by Nwosu et al. [8] and Chaha [24] in Nigeria and other workers in developing countries. [11],[19] Gugnani et al. [26] in Nigeria and Garg et al. [27] in India reported Fusarium solani and Aspergillus species as common causes of keratomycosis. In southern Florida, United States, Liesegang et al. [28] recorded a high incidence of Fusarium solani, also Vanzinni et al. reported Fusarium solani as the most frequent agent of fungal keratitis (37.2%) in an eye care hospital in Mexico city. [29]

Corneal ulcers caused by viral agents were diagnosed clinically by assessing the pattern of fluorescein stained corneal lesions seen under the slit lamp bio-microscope. There were no facilities for viral culture and isolation at the study centre. Three patients (1.3%) had facial crops of vesicular rashes typical of herpes zoster ophthalmicus. They all tested positive to HIV I and II and were referred to the retroviral clinic for treatment.

Mooren's ulcer has been reported to be prevalent in Northern and Southern Nigeria. [30],[31] It is a type of peripheral ulcer usually associated with autoimmune disease or immunological reactions to mycobacterial and Staphylococcus aureus toxins. The present study recorded eight eyes with Mooren's ulcer in seven male and one female patients. They were all less than 30 years of age and mostly unilateral. This pattern fits into the type II Wood and Kaufman [18] clinical classification with male preponderance, black race and young adults affected. The patients were treated with peritomy; two patients who had successful cryotherapy eventually became blind.

About half of the patients presented with poor vision in the affected eye (51.2%). At discharge, there was an improvement in visual acuity of 2-3 lines (Snellen's/Illiterate E charts) in 26.4% of the patient while 17.1% had minimal improvement of ≤1 line. Most of those who presented early had better outcome (≥2 lines). There was very little or no improvement in the visual acuity of farmers who had used TEM before presentation and in those with fungal keratitis despite intensive treatment. Studies in Ibadan reported poor visual outcome in farmers as 75% of them still had severe impairment at discharge. [6] Studies have reported failure rate of primary treatment as high as 31% and evisceration rate of 25% in eyes with fungal keratitis. [32] Patients with visual acuity of less than 3/60 were counselled on rehabilitation and referred to one of three rehabilitation centres in the state.

The recommended management guidelines for microbial corneal ulcers stipulates prompt and accurate microbial identification and drug sensitivity test; initial intensive antibiotic therapy based on local epidemiological experience and close monitoring of disease progression with a view of referring cases of failed initial therapy to specialists. [33] Due to inadequate laboratory support and poor patient motivation in developing countries, as in the study centre, patients are usually commenced on broad spectrum topical antibiotics and sub-conjunctival antibiotic injections. Where possible, corneal scrapings were taken before commencing antibiotic treatment and the drugs modified towards the sensitivity result later.

The limitations of this study include the retrospective nature, poor laboratory support to ensure prompt specimen processing and incomplete patient data entry and clinical notes.


   Conclusion Top


In this study most patients with corneal ulcer presented with poor vision and excessive lacrimation. Trauma was the commonest predisposing factor with bacterial organisms as the commonest isolate.


   Acknowledgement Top


The authors sincerely acknowledge the contributions of the record staff of the eye clinic that painstakingly retrieved the patients folders. We are also grateful to the resident doctors of the department for collating the data.

 
   References Top

1.Garg P, Rao GN. Corneal ulcer: Diagnosis and management. Community Eye Health 1999;12:21-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: A global perspective. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:214-21.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Upadhyay MP, Karmacharya PC, Koirala S, Shah DN, Shakya S, Shrestha JK, et al. The Bhaktapur eye study: Ocular trauma and antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of corneal ulceration in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:388-92.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Ashaye AO, Oluleye TS. Pattern of corneal opacity in Ibadan, Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine 2004;3:185-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Calatayud M, Güell JL, Oscar Gris. Textbook of Ophthalmology. Vol. 2, Chapt. 118, p.1028. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi, India  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Olawoye OO, Bekibele CO, Ashaye AO. Suppurative keratitis in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Nigerian Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;19:27-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Srinivasan M, Gonzales CA, George C, Cevallos V, Mascarenhas JM, Asokan B, et al. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:965-71.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Nwosu SN, Onyekwe LO. Corneal ulcers at a Nigerian eye hospital. The Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research 2003;5:152-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Dawodu OA, Osahon AI, Emifoniye E. Prevalence and causes of blindness in Otibhor Okhae Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Edo State, Nigeria. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2003;10:323-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Ezegwui IR. Corneal ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Africa. J Natl Med Assoc 2010;102:644-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Leck AK, Thomas PA, Hagan M, Kaliamurthy J, Ackuaku E, John M, et al. Aetiology of suppurative corneal ulcers in Ghana and south India, and epidemiology of fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1211-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Basak SK, Basak S, Mohanta A, Bhowmick A. Epidemiological and microbiological diagnosis of suppurative keratitis in Gangetic West Bengal, eastern India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.Mayer UM, Bialasiewicz AA. [Determination of resistance and antibiotic therapy in bacterial eye diseases of childhood]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1985;187:517-20.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Carmichael TR, Wolpert M, Koornhof HJ. Corneal ulceration at an urban African hospital. Br J Ophthalmol 1985;69:920-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Foster A, Sommer A. Childhood blindness from corneal ulceration in Africa: Causes, prevention, and treatment. Bull World Health Organ 1986;64:619-23.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Ayanniyi AA, Mahmoud OA, Olatunji FO, Ayanniyi RO. Pattern of ocular trauma among primary school pupils in Ilorin, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 2009;38:193-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Sandford-Smith JH, Whittle HC. Corneal ulceration following measles in Nigerian children. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:720-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Onabolu OO. Corneal Ulceration in the Eye Clinic, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria. Dissertation for Award of Fellowship by National Post Graduate Medical College of Nigeria; 1986.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Courtright P, Lewallen S, Kanjaloti S, Divala DJ. Traditional eye medicine use among patients with corneal disease in rural Malawi. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:810-2.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Mah-Sadorra JH, Yavuz SG, Najjar DM, Laibson PR, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Trends in contact lens-related corneal ulcers. Cornea 2005;24:51-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Teo L, Lim L, Tan DT, Chan TK, Jap A, Ming LH. A survey of contact lens complications in Singapore. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37:16-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Goh PP, Shamala R, Chandamalar S, Tai XY, National Eye Database Study Group. Contact lens--related corneal ulcer: A two-year review. Med J Malaysia 2010;65 Suppl A:120-3.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Meenakshi R, Kumar CS, Padmavathy S, Mittal S. Ulcerative keratitis associated with contact lens wear. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:64-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
24.Kator C. Suppurative Corneal Ulcers in National Eye Centre Kaduna. Dissertation for Award of Fellowship by National Post Graduate Medical College of Nigeria; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Hagan M, Wright E, Newman M, Dolin P, Johnson G. Causes of suppurative keratitis in Ghana. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:1024-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.Gugnani HC, Talwar RS, Njoku-Obi AN, Kodilinye HC. Mycotic keratitis in Nigeria. A study of 21 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 1976;60:607-13.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.Garg P, Gopinathan U, Choudhary K, Rao GN. Keratomycosis: Clinical and microbiologic experience with dematiaceous fungi. Ophthalmology 2000;107:574-80.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]    
28.Liesegang TJ, Forster RK. Spectrum of microbial keratitis in South Florida. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;90:38-47.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]    
29.Vanzzini Zago V, Manzano-Gayosso P, Hernández-Hernández F, Méndez-Tovar LJ, Gómez-Leal A, López Martínez R. [Mycotic keratitis in an eye care hospital in Mexico City]. Rev Iberoam Micol 2010;27:57-61.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Kietzman B. Mooren's ulcer in Nigeria. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;65:679-85.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]    
31.Majekodunmi AA. Ecology of Mooren's ulcer in Nigeria. Doc Ophthalmol 1980;49:211-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]    
32.Rapoza PA, West SK, Katala SJ, Taylor HR. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in central Tanzania. Int Ophthalmol 1991;15:123-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]    
33.Allan BD, Dart JK. Strategies for the management of microbial keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:777-86.  Back to cited text no. 33
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Document Prevalence and associated factors of corneal blindness in Ningxia in northwest China
Sheng XL, Li HP, Liu QX, Zou WQ, Bi XJ
International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014; 7(3): 557-562
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgement
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3900    
    Printed92    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal