|LETTER TO THE EDITOR
|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 50-51
Spontaneous vaginal delivery of undiagnosed bipagous conjoint twins
PC Ibekwe1, CEO Onuoha2
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, P. M. B .077, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
2 Department of Paediatric Surgery, Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, P. M. B .077, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||24-Sep-2009|
P C Ibekwe
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, P. M. B .077, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Ibekwe P C, Onuoha C. Spontaneous vaginal delivery of undiagnosed bipagous conjoint twins. Ann Afr Med 2008;7:50-1
Conjoint twins are usually rare events. The incidence in our environment has not really been documented but there have been previous reports., Conjoint twins are classified in different ways. If they are fully formed except for the parts of con-junction, they are called bipagous conjoint twins (or duplicata completa).
Vaginal delivery of conjoint twins was documented in 1950 and 1981 in Western countries. None, to our knowledge, has been reported in Nigeria. We report a case of undiagnosed bipagous conjoint twins that were delivered by Spontaneous vaginal delivery, unassisted and in a primary level health facility.
A 29-year old woman on the 18th of September 2004 with history of delivery of a set of conjoint twins at a Rural Health Centre.
She was gravida 4 para 3 with 2 living children. Though she registered for antenatal care in a private hospital, she did not carry out any investigation including ultrasound or plain x-rays. She had nothing suggestive of "big– for- date" pregnancy or polyhydramnios during the pregnancy. At about 39weeks, she went into spontaneous labor and was rushed to the nearest rural health center where she was assisted by the attendant midwife to have a spontaneous vaginal delivery of a set of conjoint twins. Both twins cried immediately after birth, passed meconium from their respective ani and also passed urine normally. They were promptly referred to our Teaching Hospital.
At presentation the babies were about four hours old, cold to touch and wrapped in their mother's delivery cloths. Both were females with a combined weight of 2.7kg. They were both conscious, satisfactorily active with good intermittent cries. They were neither pale nor jaundiced. Their skins were joined from the sternum down to the hypogastrium. Twin 1 looked smaller and dehydrated. There was cyanosis on the left leg and right foot. There was also edema on the left foot. Her respiratory rate was 34 cycles per minute, the heart rate was 120bpm, and the femoral pulse on that left leg was not palpable. First and second heart sounds were heard; there were no murmurs. The breath sounds were vesicular in both lungs fields. The Bowel sounds were present and normal. A rectal examination confirmed that she had patent anal orifices with good sphincteric tone. All other systems were grossly normal. Twin 2 was bigger and looked generally healthier than twin 1. All her vital signs and clinical findings were essentially normal. The diagnosis of Thoraco-omphalopagous conjoint twins was then made.
Size 6 feeding tube was successfully passed into the stomach of each of the babies and gastric juices with bile were obtained from each of them. 10% Dextrose in 1/5 normal saline was set up on each of them to run as calculated by their combined weight. Vitamin K injection was given to each intramuscularly. The babies were kept warm by wrapping with warm packs and blanket. It was decided to refer them to center that is conversant with management of conjoint twins. After three days at the referral hospital, the babies suddenly died one after the other. Aspiration of feeds was highly suspected, because there were no ante-mortem signs of distress.
Postmortem examination revealed that all the joining from the sternum to the hypogastrium was predominantly at the skin level. No organs were shared. The sternae, the ribs, the thoracic cavities and viscera were all separate. However, the heart of twin 1 had a single chamber from which emanated the aorta. The heart of twin 2 had the usual 4 chambers but they were enlarged. Other systems were essentially normal. Cause of death was then ascribed to Heart failure.
The exact incidence of conjoint twinning is unknown and figures are unreliable because not all cases reach the hospital; some are aborted while some are thrown away as monsters. The figure however is in the range of 1 in 14 000 births in the non-caucasian.
Although vaginal delivery for conjoint twins has been reported,  when diagnosed in utero, the recommended mode of delivery is cesarean section not vaginal delivery, because of the attendant risks to both mother and twins., Undiagnosed conjoint twins may cause dystocia in labor leading to emergency operative delivery thereby endangering the survival of the twins. Surprisingly, there were none of such in this case. When diagnosis is made after birth, prompt transfer to a more ideal institution is a wise decision, as was done for these twins.
There is great need to improve the health care delivery system to make it available and accessible to all our pregnant women. Education of our women on the need for antenatal registration, regular antenatal clinic attendance and hospital delivery should be emphasized. This will make for early detection of such anomalies so that proper arrangement could be made for safe delivery and management of the conjoint babies.
| References|| |
|1.||Grower JI, Teste DW, Teich S. Dicephalic dipus dibrachius an unusual case of conjoint twins. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31:1698-1700. |
|2.||Owolabi AT, Oseni SBA, Sowande OA, et al. Dicephalus dibrachius dipus conjoined twin in a triplet pregnancy. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;22:87-889. |
|3.||Siegel I. Thoracopagous. Vaginal delivery without destructive operation. Med J Aust. 1950;97:40. |
|4.||Green DJ. Vaginal delivery of conjoint. Med J Aust. 1981;2:356-360. |
|5.||Nelson MM, Bhethay E, Beighton P. Excessive Siamese twinning. S Afr Med J. 1976;50:697-698. |